Re: [SAtalk] Razor2 method not found

2002-09-18 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:10:39AM +0100, Caines, Max wrote: > That's correct. "spamd" in 2.41 wouldn't recognize the -H option, and I > couldn't find it in the documentation, so I tried 2.50, where it worked > OK. Errr, then you didn't have 2.41 installed. :| I personally wouldn't run 2.50 ye

RE: [SAtalk] Razor2 method not found

2002-09-18 Thread Caines, Max
> > Ok, that's valid as long as your perl knows to look there. Is the > directory listed under "@INC" in "perl -V"? > Yes. > You installed the CVS version of SA? That's correct. "spamd" in 2.41 wouldn't recognize the -H option, and I couldn't find it in the documentation, so I tried 2.50, wh

Re: [SAtalk] Razor2 method not found

2002-09-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:33:55PM +0100, Caines, Max wrote: > My "site_perl" path doesn't include the Perl version for "historical" > reasons. SA and Razor2 are indeed in the same area: Razor2 and Mail are > both in /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl. I installaed both manually, Ok, that's valid as

Re: [SAtalk] Razor2 method not found

2002-09-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 09:19:10AM -0700, Gary Funck wrote: > - how has Vipul's Razor been working for you? I saw some reports about VR > taking a long time to process incoming messages. We don't have a lot of mail > traffic here, so that may not be an issue, but we'd like to know in advance > if

RE: [SAtalk] Razor2 method not found

2002-09-17 Thread Gary Funck
follow up: > > - I'm a bit confused regarding the distinction between Razor, and > > Razor2. I > > added the Razor package via CPAN, but I see from e-mail traffic > > on this list > > that if I'm running SA version 2.41, I should go to Razor2? I did see a > > installation warning message similar t

RE: [SAtalk] Razor2 method not found

2002-09-17 Thread Gary Funck
follow up: > > - I'm a bit confused regarding the distinction between Razor, and > Razor2. I > added the Razor package via CPAN, but I see from e-mail traffic > on this list > that if I'm running SA version 2.41, I should go to Razor2? I did see a > installation warning message similar to the one

RE: [SAtalk] Razor2 method not found

2002-09-17 Thread Gary Funck
> > razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Can't locate object > method "new" via package "Razor2::Client::Agent" at > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 374. > > I can't see what changes between the two ways of running SA. Razor > itself seems to work properly

RE: [SAtalk] Razor2 method not found

2002-09-17 Thread Caines, Max
Hi Theo, My "site_perl" path doesn't include the Perl version for "historical" reasons. SA and Razor2 are indeed in the same area: Razor2 and Mail are both in /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl. I installaed both manually, rather than via CPAN (which keeps trying to upgrade my version of Perl while p