RE: [Razor-users] RE: [SAtalk] Razor down - Works for me

2003-01-09 Thread Mike Loiterman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:29 PM Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 03:10:35PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: >> [15:09:21 root@fat_man: /home/mike/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.43]# >> razor-discover -d debug: Raz

Re: [Razor-users] RE: [SAtalk] Razor down - Works for me

2003-01-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 03:10:35PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: > [15:09:21 root@fat_man: /home/mike/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.43]# razor-discover -d > debug: Razor Agents 1.19, protocol version 2. > debug: Read server list from /root/.razor.lst > debug: Discovering closest server in the razor.vipul.net

RE: [SAtalk] Razor down - Works for me

2003-01-09 Thread Mike Loiterman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:30 PM Matt Kettler wrote: > Some clippings from razor-check -d > Jan 09 14:23:12.707051 check[24680]: [ 5] Connecting to > truth.cloudmark.com ... Jan 09 14:23:13.153109 check[24680]: [ 8]

Re: [SAtalk] Razor down

2003-01-09 Thread Marcus Schopen
Hi, Mike Loiterman wrote: > > It appears that the Razor server is down. Anyone else notice this? my server ( munitions2.xs4all.nl - 194.109.217.74 ) seems to be down too. Where do I get an alternative list? razor-discover doesn't help. It sets the server IP to munitions2.xs4all.nl again. Ciao

Re: [SAtalk] Razor down

2003-01-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:11:25PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: > It appears that the Razor server is down. Anyone else notice this? They're working fine for me. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "My girlfriend always laughs during sex -- no matter what she's reading." - Emo Philips ms

RE: [SAtalk] Razor down

2003-01-09 Thread Mike Loiterman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:36 PM Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:11:25PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: >> It appears that the Razor server is down. Anyone else notice this? > > They're working f