Re: [SAtalk] Razor Compatability

2002-06-26 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 05:30:52PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > To remove the extra debugging output one needs to comment out line 164 > in Signature/Ephemeral.pm > > --- lib/Razor2/Signature/Ephemeral.pm,origSun Jun 16 13:22:22 2002 > +++ lib/Razor2/Signature/Ephemeral.pm Sun Jun 16 13:18

Re: [SAtalk] Razor Compatability

2002-06-16 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 10:30:39AM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote: > Great work Theo. Thanks! We'll probably want to make a 2.31 release with some > updated scores and Razor 2 support asap. FYI: My latest patch went in to Razor 2.06, and I just upgraded my box to 2.07 which came out soon after 2.0

Re: [SAtalk] Razor Compatability

2002-06-16 Thread Craig R Hughes
Great work Theo. Thanks! We'll probably want to make a 2.31 release with some updated scores and Razor 2 support asap. C Theo Van Dinter wrote: TVD> On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 04:39:25PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: TVD> > I've sent in a patch to add support, but there were some bugs in the TVD

Re: [SAtalk] Razor Compatability

2002-06-15 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 04:39:25PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > I've sent in a patch to add support, but there were some bugs in the > 2.03 version of Razor2 which caused problems with spamd (it works fine > with spamassasin). This is the first time I've gotten online today and > I notice ther

Re: [SAtalk] Razor Compatability

2002-06-15 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 10:48:35AM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote: > Razor2 support will be added to the CVS branch very soon, but will probably not > be stable for a few days. I've sent in a patch to add support, but there were some bugs in the 2.03 version of Razor2 which caused problems with spam

Re: [SAtalk] Razor Compatability

2002-06-15 Thread Craig R Hughes
Razor2 support will be added to the CVS branch very soon, but will probably not be stable for a few days. C Matthew Cline wrote: MC> On Saturday 15 June 2002 12:47 am, Jim Scott wrote: MC> > Ok I have just installed on a new machine SpamAssassin 2.30 and Razor 2.x MC> > and SpamAssassin is repo

Re: [SAtalk] Razor Compatability

2002-06-15 Thread Matthew Cline
On Saturday 15 June 2002 12:47 am, Jim Scott wrote: > Ok I have just installed on a new machine SpamAssassin 2.30 and Razor 2.x > and SpamAssassin is reporting that razor is not found. Does the version of > SpamAssassin support Razor 2.x? No, because Razor 2.x uses the Razor2 Perl package, while