Gary Carr wrote:
This is a shame. The guy should do it for a fee and make it a small
business. They are the most affective RBLs we have used to date.
Ditto. DynaBlock is my most effective list. I would be glad to pay an
annual fee.
---
This S
Yeah, I hear ya. Don't blame him but hoping someone will pick it up and run
with it.
Gary
> How about *YOU* do it for a fee and make it a small business? =P Don't
> have the time? Oh...neither does he.
>
>
> *Sigh*
>
> To the *.easynet.nl DNSBL maintainer (even though you may not read thi
Gary Carr wrote:
This is a shame. The guy should do it for a fee and make it a small
business.
It *is* a shame, but did you read the original announcement?
Maintainer of *.easynet.nl wrote:
Isn't this all kinda sudden?
- Yes. Sometimes, you just know that it's time to say goodbye. And the
mome
This is a shame. The guy should do it for a fee and make it a small
business. They are the most affective RBLs we have used to date.
Gary
> The easynet blacklists/spamfilters (blackholes.easynet.nl,
> proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl, dynablock.easynet.nl,
> spamdomains.blackholes.easynet.nl, and
At 01:43 PM 11/21/2003, Mike Kuentz (2) wrote:
What
are people using for blacklists at the MTA level these days?
(null set)
I do it all at the SA level, giving the users control over if they discard
stuff or not.
---
This SF.net email is spo
