Re: [SAtalk] Pronouncability of Sender Address

2003-06-25 Thread Brian Godette
From: "Fox Flanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Wednesday 25 June 2003 08:30 am, Fox Flanders wrote: > We need a prounouncability test of the sender addresses. If it has a bunch > of ixf38jk3 crud in it, it is more likely to be spam. > The irony is astounding. --

Re: [SAtalk] Pronouncability of Sender Address

2003-06-25 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 15:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We need a prounouncability test of the sender addresses. If it has a bunch > of ixf38jk3 crud in it, it is more likely to be spam. /me points and laughs at lds0062 Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Co