On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 23:36:47 +
"David Cantrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The fools also list .uk, so you're in good company.
Seems like a lot of ccTLD's are listed in the whois database.
.ph is and so is .se but I can't for the life of me figure out why .se is.
There's "evidence" but no
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 12:24:54AM +0100, S?ren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> Using rfc-ignorant.com would be a bad idea.
> In Denmark (where I live) our TLD-administrator is restricted by law from
> running a whois server for .dk. This has earned the entire country a place in
> rfc-ignorant.com's datab
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 12:24:54AM +0100, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> Using rfc-ignorant.com would be a bad idea.
> In Denmark (where I live) our TLD-administrator is restricted by law from
> running a whois server for .dk. This has earned the entire country a place in
> rfc-ignorant.com's datab
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:40:31PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:20:32PM -0800, Matthew Cline wrote:
> > Mentioned in one of the article's comments was another RBL that SA currently
> > doesn't use, http://njabl.org/
>
> As well as: http://www.rfc-ignorant.com/
Usin
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:20:32PM -0800, Matthew Cline wrote:
> Mentioned in one of the article's comments was another RBL that SA currently
> doesn't use, http://njabl.org/
As well as: http://www.rfc-ignorant.com/
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I once witnessed a long-winded, month-long fla
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 08:25 am, Jason wrote:
> Looks like ORBZ has been shutdown...
>
> As seen on slashdot
>
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/20/1528246&mode=thread&tid=111
Mentioned in one of the article's comments was another RBL that SA currently
doesn't use, http://njabl.org
