Do you have a size threshold set? I believe that 2.43 has a setting that
won't scan a message over a certain file size, and this message was around
340K. It might have been too big, and SA might have skipped it due to its
size.
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:23:04PM +0100, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> Just got a message through with the following headers. The message (which
> was spam) was not even processed by spamd even if log indicates it was sent
> for filtering.
>
> Dec 2 11:12:47 bebop postfix/qmgr[74304]: 43DB0142D7
spamc by default doesn't process huge messages over 250k in size. This
message was 340k.
see man spamc:
-s max_size
Set the maximum message size which will be sent to spamd -- any
bigger than this threshold and the message will be returned
unprocessed. No
Per olof Ljungmark said:
> Yes, as several pointed out, that was the problem. This spammer sends the
> entire catalogue as a pdf, did a spamc -s 1048576 to fix.
interestingly it was a real person sending mail from a real desktop
machine - one of those rare "one to one" spams that are hard to
tel
At 07:41 12/2/2002 -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
Do you have a size threshold set? I believe that 2.43 has a setting that
won't scan a message over a certain file size, and this message was around
340K. It might have been too big, and SA might have skipped it due to its
size.
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Pe
