It'll only match exactly X-x (well, also X-X or x-x) but not X-x-something
C
Matthew Cline wrote:
> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 15:05:30 -0800
> From: Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] More misc rules
>
> On Monday
I added both of these -- thanks.
C
Matthew Cline wrote:
> I've seen a few spams that have javascript in an URI, so:
>
> uri JAVASCRIPT_URI/^javascript:/i
> describe JAVASCRIPT_URIJavascript in an URI
>
> =-=-=
>
> Finally, I've seen a few spams that simply have a "#", and
On Monday 25 March 2002 07:50 am, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Matthew Cline wrote:
> > header X_X_PRESENT X-x =~ /./
> > describe X_X_PRESENT Found an X-x header
> Pine will generate an X-X-Sender header under perfectly innocent
> circumstances.
Will a hea
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Matthew Cline wrote:
> header X_X_PRESENT X-x =~ /./
> describe X_X_PRESENT Found an X-x header
Pine will generate an X-X-Sender header under perfectly innocent
circumstances.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing