Re: [SAtalk] More misc rules

2002-03-25 Thread Craig R Hughes
It'll only match exactly X-x (well, also X-X or x-x) but not X-x-something C Matthew Cline wrote: > Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 15:05:30 -0800 > From: Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] More misc rules > > On Monday

Re: [SAtalk] More misc rules

2002-03-25 Thread Craig R Hughes
I added both of these -- thanks. C Matthew Cline wrote: > I've seen a few spams that have javascript in an URI, so: > > uri JAVASCRIPT_URI/^javascript:/i > describe JAVASCRIPT_URIJavascript in an URI > > =-=-= > > Finally, I've seen a few spams that simply have a "#", and

Re: [SAtalk] More misc rules

2002-03-25 Thread Matthew Cline
On Monday 25 March 2002 07:50 am, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Matthew Cline wrote: > > header X_X_PRESENT X-x =~ /./ > > describe X_X_PRESENT Found an X-x header > Pine will generate an X-X-Sender header under perfectly innocent > circumstances. Will a hea

Re: [SAtalk] More misc rules

2002-03-25 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Matthew Cline wrote: > header X_X_PRESENT X-x =~ /./ > describe X_X_PRESENT Found an X-x header Pine will generate an X-X-Sender header under perfectly innocent circumstances. ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing