> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Theo
> Van Dinter
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:26 PM
> To: Ross Vandegrift
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Mail routing with SA
>
>
>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:25:53PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> The way I do this is through the use of alias or virtusertable
> configurations. The mail router has a list of all valid addresses,
> and it's always something like:
>
> user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That would work nicely. It's a bit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On December 19, 2002 12:55, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I need a more intelligent mail routing setup. The primary MX
> for our domain is a sendmail machine that runs spamassassin. It scans
> email, and then (via an entry in the
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> The primary MX host just routes mail to the delivery server. How have
> you guys handled this problem? Ideally, I'd rather not have two
> machines with real work to do spend so much time trying to send out
> bounce messages to non
