Re: [SAtalk] Logfile of spamrecognized mails

2003-09-23 Thread Jens Strohschnitter
Hi, thats all I need, but how is it possible that the SPAM-Mails will not be quarantined. Only it should be written a logentry and the mail should be delivered to the recipient, marked as spam (*SPAM*). is this possible, too ? Thanxx for your reply > > > Yes. In your exim config, mak

Re: [SAtalk] Logfile of spamrecognized mails

2003-09-23 Thread Jens Strohschnitter
>> From: Jens Strohschnitter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 7:01 AM >> To: SpamAssassin >> Subject: [SAtalk] Logfile of Spam-detected mails >> >> >> Hi there, >> >> is it possible to write a logfile that only contains >> entries that showes spam-detected mails l

RE: [SAtalk] Logfile of spamrecognized mails

2003-09-17 Thread Gilson, Larry
Just to add to this, I setup logging like this (please forgive the wrap on the formail line): LOGFILE = /var/merlin/log/procmaillog VERBOSE = off LOGABSTRACT = off TRAP='echo "=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~="; \ echo "Date:$DATE"; \ formail -XFrom: -XTo: -XSubject: -XX-Merlin -XX-Spam-Status: -XX-Sp

Re: [SAtalk] Logfile of spamrecognized mails

2003-09-17 Thread Jim
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 04:39:33PM +0200, Jens Strohschnitter wrote: > is it possible to write a seperate logfile for spamd/spamc > that logs all spam-recognized mails ? The parameterlist of > spamd/spamc showes me no command that I can use for. Use procmail. Fwiw, here's something I am toying wi