You mean like having all outbound mail
learned as “HAM”?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Nichols, William
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003
5:30 PM
To: SA Mailing list
Subject: [SAtalk] Idea for
spamassassin
I attended a seminar yesterday
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nichols, William writes:
> I attended a seminar yesterday about spam. One of the idea that was
> pitched as being in a product was training the inbound spam detecting on
> the patterns of outbound mail.
>
> They talked about their filters looking a
All y'all should read bugzilla #47
C
Rob McMillin wrote:
> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:12:32 -0800
> From: Rob McMillin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] idea: Rules about other rules
>
> Matthew Cline wrote:
>
> >I got th
Matthew Cline wrote:
>I got the idea of creating rules that would be triggered depending upon what
>other rules had already been triggered, so that you could combine different
>tests for greater accuracy. For instance, the rule US_DOLLARS is described
>as a "Nigerian scam key phrase", but it'
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 04:44:59PM -0800, Matthew Cline wrote:
> I got the idea of creating rules that would be triggered depending upon what
> other rules had already been triggered, so that you could combine different
> tests for greater accuracy. For instance, the rule US_DOLLARS is describe
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 08:38, Greg Ward wrote:
> [1] OK, OK, I thought of an idea: send a message to a special cooked
> address that you (the programmer) control; for SA, it might be
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". A script behind this address
> would record everything it can think of about thi
On 01 March 2002, Matthew Cline said:
> Even if this is a good idea (is it?), I don't know how to go about getting
> the user's email adress. If it's the user who's invoking SA, there might be
> some way to get the info from the environment, but I want to do it in a
> platform independant mann
As I was re-writing AWL just now, I noticed that in fact the way
checking is set up, it kind of has been planning to do something like
this for a while now. I'll think about it on the 2.2 timeline --
probably combining in some of the other ideas from the "spamassassin in
100% C" discussion as wel
