On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:47:31AM -0700, Robert Menschel wrote:
> I'm limited to ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs, and by design in the current
> versions I can change rule scores, but I can't add even the simplest of
> rules.
Please RTFM:
allow_user_rules { 0 | 1 } (default: 0)
Well, it did score 13.30 without the bayes learner
and even 16.30 using the bayes data base,
with SpamAssassin (2.53 1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp):
---
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) SA Developers: PLEASE provide some method whereby end-users like me
can implement header, body, and uri rules in user_prefs.
2) Can anyone run the spam below against a vanilla ruleset, 2.5[45]
and/or 2.6, and let me know if this spam should have be
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
> along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
> mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
>
> Content preview: -BEGIN PGP S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) SA Developers: PLEASE provide some method whereby end-users like me
can implement header, body, and uri rules in user_prefs.
2) Can anyone run the spam below against a vanilla ruleset, 2.5[45]
and/or 2.6, and let me know if this spam should have been caught under
2.54?
