Re: [SAtalk] feature request

2003-02-21 Thread Evan Platt
At 09:10 AM 02/21/2003, you wrote: Well I sent a post while back on this and noone got it or at the time didn't think of it as a of any use.. But as far as im concerned if they get blacklisted you should never see them again. That is the point of a blacklist... I tried working something like this i

Re: [SAtalk] Feature request

2003-02-19 Thread Justin Mason
Greg Cirino said: > We do the same thing with a similar setup, increased > the value of username to varchar(100) > and it works just fine. > > I have the same username on 3 different domains and > all have separate prefs. Would it be worthwhile modifying the README appropriately? Sounds like

Re: [SAtalk] Feature request (maybe)

2002-12-02 Thread Justin Mason
Daniel Quinlan said: > > I'd really like to see a blacklist_to option somewhere, or some other > > way of automatically tagging a given destination as indicating 99.99% > > probable spam. > > Here's what I do: > > header LOCAL_BAD_ADDRESSEnvelope-To =~ /foo\@bar\.com/i > describe LOCAL_

Re: [SAtalk] Feature request (maybe)

2002-12-01 Thread Daniel Quinlan
"Rob MacGregor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd really like to see a blacklist_to option somewhere, or some other > way of automatically tagging a given destination as indicating 99.99% > probable spam. > > Basically, I've got an email address that I have to have to host some > web pages on my