Re: [SAtalk] FAKE_HELO_AOL

2003-10-17 Thread Patrick Morris
Bill Polhemus wrote: This one got through. Can we figure out how and why? With just the body of the message and no headers, probably not. That really not enough to work with. --- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conf

RE: [SAtalk] FAKE_HELO_AOL

2003-10-17 Thread Bill Polhemus
This one got through. Can we figure out how and why? Notice purposeful misspellings as obfuscations. William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E. Polhemus Engineering Company Katy, Texas USA -Begin Included Message- 16121g11n4m06a8a53594548b10126vx 291uqs7rz3xo63jl8w5ie14f3q3c3770The stoicism which she

Re: [SAtalk] FAKE_HELO_AOL

2003-10-17 Thread Justin Mason
Dominik Ruf writes: > * Lewis Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-17 22:41]: > > I see messages receiving points for FAKE_HELO_AOL yet when I look in the > > logs the SMTP server that sent the message is indeed listed in as an ip > > address as an AOL mail server. I think that the helo name is inc

Re: [SAtalk] FAKE_HELO_AOL

2003-10-17 Thread Dominik Ruf
* Lewis Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-17 22:41]: > I see messages receiving points for FAKE_HELO_AOL yet when I look in the > logs the SMTP server that sent the message is indeed listed in as an ip > address as an AOL mail server. I think that the helo name is incorrect but > I doubt that aol