> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:26:22 -0400 (EDT)
> Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 1, 2003 at 00:03, Nigel Wilkinson wrote:
> >
> > >I want to filter useing the number of asterixes in the X-Spam-Level
> > >header but I think this is a wildcard in procmail. Does anyone know
> > >if this wi
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:26:22 -0400 (EDT)
Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2003 at 00:03, Nigel Wilkinson wrote:
>
> >I want to filter useing the number of asterixes in the X-Spam-Level
> >header but I think this is a wildcard in procmail. Does anyone know
> >if this will upset procmai
On Oct 1, 2003 at 00:03, Nigel Wilkinson wrote:
>I want to filter useing the number of asterixes in the X-Spam-Level
>header but I think this is a wildcard in procmail. Does anyone know
>if this will upset procmail.
Yes. Use something like:
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: \*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
--
Satya.
The following rules work for me:
#
# Distinguish really bad (8 pts or higher) spam from just moderately
# bad (5 pts) spam.
#
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
spam-certain
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*
spam
-mike
---
This sf.net email i
