Re: [SAtalk] DB_File problem prevents Bayes working

2003-12-10 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 05:40:49PM -0800, Fred Bennett wrote: > version.c:30:16: db.h: No such file or directory > > Now I'm at a loss. It's probably staring me right in the face, but being > a Linux/Spamassassin/CPAN noob and a tired, fried one at that, I don't > see what should be tried next. So

Fishing lesson (Re: [SAtalk] DB_File

2003-12-09 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Jack Gostl wrote: > I sent you the error message, I'm pretty sure there was no user associated > with it. There were tens of thousands of those errors in the log. I'm not > sure how to pinpoint the culprit. I guess I'll have to go to each user and > rebuild their database. Ye

Re: [SAtalk] DB_File

2003-12-09 Thread Jack Gostl
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, David B Funk wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Jack Gostl wrote: > > > > My bet is that your Bayes database got trashed. > > > > Possible, but which database? We have many users all with their own? Also, > > if its a trashed Bayes db, why does the message go away when I restart > >

Re: [SAtalk] DB_File

2003-12-09 Thread Jack Gostl
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:52:17PM -0500, Jack Gostl wrote: > > Possible, but which database? We have many users all with their own? Also, > > if its a trashed Bayes db, why does the message go away when I restart > > spamd? > > If you just went to 2.6

Re: [SAtalk] DB_File

2003-12-08 Thread David B Funk
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Jack Gostl wrote: > > My bet is that your Bayes database got trashed. > > Possible, but which database? We have many users all with their own? Also, > if its a trashed Bayes db, why does the message go away when I restart > spamd? Which ever database it was looking at when it

Re: [SAtalk] DB_File

2003-12-08 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:52:17PM -0500, Jack Gostl wrote: > Possible, but which database? We have many users all with their own? Also, > if its a trashed Bayes db, why does the message go away when I restart > spamd? If you just went to 2.60, and you weren't using DB_File before, you need to run

Re: [SAtalk] DB_File

2003-12-08 Thread Jack Gostl
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, David B Funk wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Jack Gostl wrote: > > > > > My logs are flooded with the following message: > > > > Dec 8 16:55:39 argos spamd[83414]: Use of uninitialized value in numeric > > eq (==) at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesSt

Re: [SAtalk] DB_File

2003-12-08 Thread David B Funk
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Jack Gostl wrote: > > My logs are flooded with the following message: > > Dec 8 16:55:39 argos spamd[83414]: Use of uninitialized value in numeric > eq (==) at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm > line 1437. > > This is intermittent and starte

Re: [SAtalk] DB_File

2003-09-30 Thread Jack Gostl
Question withdrawn. The environment (as in $ENV{}) wasn't set up properly. On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Jack Gostl wrote: > > I'm trying to install DB_File so that we can use Bayes under 2.6, and > during the install I keep getting: > > "version.c", line 30.10: 1506-296 (S) #include file not found. >

Re: [SAtalk] DB_File

2003-09-30 Thread Adam Stein
>I'm trying to install DB_File so that we can use Bayes under 2.6, and >during the install I keep getting: > >"version.c", line 30.10: 1506-296 (S) #include file not found. >make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1. > >The odd thing is that if I do this install on ANOTHER machine,

RE: [SAtalk] DB_File errors

2003-03-27 Thread Chris DiPierro
Actually, this is a missing db.h You need to install the db4-devel RPM ... presumably anyway. For me on RH 7.1 it was db3-devel, but that's an outdated pacakage, so I suspect newere RHs and distributions have a db4-devel equivilent. Otherwise you'll get link errors later due to mismatched versions