Re: [SAtalk] Building SA 2.60, errors

2003-10-25 Thread Bob Apthorpe
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 15:57:18 +0100 (BST) Martin Radford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > At Fri Oct 24 19:38:50 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > > > goes. There's serious discussion about dumping support for any perl under > > 5.6 in future releases. Apparently trying to make SA work under 5.00x, >

Re: [SAtalk] Building SA 2.60, errors

2003-10-25 Thread Martin Radford
At Fri Oct 24 19:38:50 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > goes. There's serious discussion about dumping support for any perl under > 5.6 in future releases. Apparently trying to make SA work under 5.00x, There's a statement in SA 2.60's README that says: "The SpamAssassin 2.6x release series will be

Re: [SAtalk] Building SA 2.60, errors

2003-10-24 Thread Patrick Morris
Hugh Caley wrote: I'm trying to build spamassassin 2.60 as a non-root user on my ISP's mail server. RedHat 7.3, perl version 5.004_04. I'm not sure where to go from here. I'm getting the following errors: That's a really ancient version of Perl. I'm not sure you'll be able to make it work.

Re: [SAtalk] Building SA 2.60, errors

2003-10-24 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 07:07:10PM -0700, Hugh Caley wrote: > I'm trying to build spamassassin 2.60 as a non-root user on my ISP's > mail server. RedHat 7.3, perl version 5.004_04. I'm not sure where to > go from here. I'm getting the following errors: Hrm. I know SA supports back to 5.005,

Re: [SAtalk] Building SA 2.60, errors

2003-10-24 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:07 PM 10/23/2003, Hugh Caley wrote: I'm trying to build spamassassin 2.60 as a non-root user on my ISP's mail server. RedHat 7.3, perl version 5.004_04. I'm not sure where to go from here. I'm getting the following errors: What version of ExtUtils::MakeMaker do they have? SA requires 5.4