On 21 Jan 2004 at 13:01, Douglas Kirkland wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 21 January 2004 11:59, Jesse Regier wrote:
> > Is there a way to have Spamassassin use a seperate bayes database for
> > each local domain or group of domains?
> >
> > It would be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 11:59, Jesse Regier wrote:
> Is there a way to have Spamassassin use a seperate bayes database for
> each local domain or group of domains?
>
> It would be nice to have something like...
>
> bayes_path = /var/spool/$DOMA
I would guess this is normal. Think of things like Message-Id's, vs. common
words like "the" which will appear very many times.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Litvinov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 10:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk
> Yes, that size seems way out of line. It should be using about 30~50
> bytes per token, assuming typical token size.
> According to your 'non-token data: ntokens' that bayes_toks file should
> be using about 5~6 Mbytes; unless something is whacko, or you have some
> -very- large tokens in there.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 04:42:07PM +0900, alan premselaar wrote:
> My bayes database seems excessively large at 967M:
>
> -rw-rw-rw-1 defang defang 967M Nov 26 15:58 bayes_toks
Hrm. Yes, that is rather large.
I would try forcing an expire and see if that helps. If not, I'd see
if t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello alan,
Tuesday, November 25, 2003, 11:42:07 PM, you wrote:
ap> I've recently noticed something I think is a little strange but I'd
ap> like to confirm it with the list.
ap> My bayes database seems excessively large at 967M:
Yes, this seems exc
On 2003/11/26, at 19:22, David B Funk wrote:
...snip...
Yes, that size seems way out of line. It should be using about 30~50
bytes per token, assuming typical token size.
According to your 'non-token data: ntokens' that bayes_toks file should
be using about 5~6 Mbytes; unless something is whacko, o
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, alan premselaar wrote:
> I've recently noticed something I think is a little strange but I'd
> like to confirm it with the list.
>
> My bayes database seems excessively large at 967M:
>
> -rw-rw-rw-1 defang defang61k Nov 26 16:34 bayes_journal
> -rw-rw-rw-1 d
- Original Message -
From: "alan premselaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spam Assassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:27 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] bayes database size
> I've recently noticed something I think is a little strange but
> I'd like to confirm it with the li
- Original Message -
From: "alan premselaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spam Assassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:27 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] bayes database size
> I've recently noticed something I think is a little strange but
> I'd like to confirm it with the li
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:53:13PM -0500, Mark Jenks wrote:
> Funny, I just moved my 1.85 Berkeley DB to Version 7 doing is this way.
> (except I had to use db-dump185)
Updating your DB is one thing. Merging 2 DBs together is completely
different. I doubt the db-file utils understand merging to
Funny, I just moved my 1.85 Berkeley DB to Version 7 doing is this way.
(except I had to use db-dump185)
-Mark
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:36:17PM -0500, Mark Jenks wrote:
I would think that you would be able to do something like:
db_dump -f bayes-1.dump bayes-1
db_dum
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:38:41PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:18:28AM -0700, Marek Dohojda wrote:
> > Is it possible to merge two bayes databases into one? I have two mailservers
>
> Possible? Yes. However, there are no tools currently available to do
> this, so y
I would think that you would be able to do something like:
db_dump -f bayes-1.dump bayes-1
db_dump -f bayes-2.dump bayes-2
cat bayes-1.dump bayes-2.dump > bayes.merge
db_load -f bayes.merge bayes-new
cp bayes-new bayes-1
cp bayes-new bayes-2
-Mark
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 1
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:36:17PM -0500, Mark Jenks wrote:
> I would think that you would be able to do something like:
>
> db_dump -f bayes-1.dump bayes-1
> db_dump -f bayes-2.dump bayes-2
> cat bayes-1.dump bayes-2.dump > bayes.merge
> db_load -f bayes.merge bayes-new
> cp bayes-new bayes-1
> c
Hmmm how would I go about writing a tool such as this? Sorry I don't have
much information on this. Where can I find the stracture of this database?
(sorry if this is FAQ).
Yeah well maybe I want to sink my databases ;) syncing them is way too much
work.
-Original Message-
From: Theo Va
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:18:28AM -0700, Marek Dohojda wrote:
> Is it possible to merge two bayes databases into one? I have two mailservers
Possible? Yes. However, there are no tools currently available to do
this, so you'd have to write them yourself.
> learning the databases are quite a bit
Okay .. I found tools, no problem...
But .. since SA runs as a non-privledged user with no logon on a site-wide
install, how do you run the tools to see what that db has in it? SA wants
to see the db under /root/.spamassassin. SA runs as the user "filter" which
has no logon.
Ray
18 matches
Mail list logo
