Simon Byrnand writes:
>At 19:50 29/06/03 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>>On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:17:25AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>> > to trigger on netfolder updates. Is this not considered a bug, considering
>> > how high the scores of those two tests are ? The combined score is 7.1
>> > w
At 19:50 29/06/03 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:17:25AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> to trigger on netfolder updates. Is this not considered a bug, considering
> how high the scores of those two tests are ? The combined score is 7.1
> which is above our conservative defa
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:17:25AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> to trigger on netfolder updates. Is this not considered a bug, considering
> how high the scores of those two tests are ? The combined score is 7.1
> which is above our conservative default of 7.0
Well, any rule changes are ver
At 19:08 29/06/03 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 10:05:30AM
+1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Ah good...so maybe there is still time to look at the false
positives with
> Outlook netfolder updates ? :)
sorry. we're past the rule change time. just bug fixes
now.
:-(
Pity...
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:17:25 +1200
To: Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 final and CVS
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 19:08 29/06/03 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 10:05:30AM +1200, Simon Byrnand
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 10:05:30AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Ah good...so maybe there is still time to look at the false positives with
> Outlook netfolder updates ? :)
sorry. we're past the rule change time. just bug fixes now.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"You ripped his arm off.
Ye
At 13:59 27/06/03 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 05:31:23PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Then I went to http://spamassassin.org/devel/ to get the new PR-1 release,
> since I couldn't get any CVS stuff and saw that there's now a file which
> seems to be the final. Downloaded,
Justin Mason wrote on Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:05:10 -0700:
> oh great :( probably gmane's archiving has fallen behind. When were
> they posted?
>
The archiving is okay, it's uptodate. The problem, I just found out, is
that they thread all messages to the original, so when I went back all the
page
"Kai Schaetzl" writes:
>I accidentally posted the following question in a reply to a posting from
>Daniel Quinlan to sa-devel instead to sa-talk. When I finally noticed this I
>tried to look it or any answers up in the archive at gmane.org, but I cannot
>find it nor Daniel's original posting th
Daniel Quinlan wrote on 27 Jun 2003 10:58:50 -0700:
> Did you check the version number? It's just the standard nightly build,
> linked from http://www.spamassassin.org/downloads.html
Oh, I see. So, this at least is working, nice :-) It's a fresh tar.gz from
tonight, it's as good as the cvs for
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 05:31:23PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Then I went to http://spamassassin.org/devel/ to get the new PR-1 release,
> since I couldn't get any CVS stuff and saw that there's now a file which
> seems to be the final. Downloaded, make test and all and it appears to be
There
"Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I accidentally posted the following question in a reply to a posting from
> Daniel Quinlan to sa-devel instead to sa-talk. When I finally noticed this I
> tried to look it or any answers up in the archive at gmane.org, but I cannot
> find it nor Dani
12 matches
Mail list logo
