RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 Problems

2003-10-07 Thread Jeffrey Wheat
Thanks for the help on this everyone. Jeff > -Original Message- > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 9:16 AM > To: Jeffrey Wheat > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 Problems > > > under X-Spa

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 Problems

2003-10-07 Thread Adam Denenberg
under X-Spam-Level: i only see 6 stars, which means the number was probably 6.99 something, and got rounded to 7 in the email, but didnt actually hit the required 7.0 adam On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:01, Jeffrey Wheat wrote: > I am seeing problems with 2.60 on a FreeBSD > server, using exim as my mt

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 Problems

2003-10-07 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:01:29AM -0400, Jeffrey Wheat wrote: > I am seeing problems with 2.60 on a FreeBSD > server, using exim as my mta. Emails are > being tagged as having the required hits > but are not being tagged as spam. Here is > a header. Help would be appreciated. FYI, I just added an

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 Problems

2003-10-07 Thread Tom Meunier
6 asterisks indicates it's not quite 7.0. Probably 6.9something. You could add up the scores to verify if you really like, but that's what's happening. X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=7.0 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_10,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 Problems

2003-10-07 Thread Martin Schroeder
On 2003-10-07 09:01:29 -0400, Jeffrey Wheat wrote: > I am seeing problems with 2.60 on a FreeBSD > server, using exim as my mta. Emails are > being tagged as having the required hits > but are not being tagged as spam. Here is > a header. Help would be appreciated. [...] > X-Spam-Level: ** >