In your message regarding Re: [SAtalk] "Good" email clients dated
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:03:24 -0400, Theo Van Dinter said that ...
>TVD-
>TVD- You're talking about rules with negative scores, thereby likely to make a
>TVD- message "not spam". A "p
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:53:15AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > increase in spam. Positive scores are flawed IMHO.
>
> I'm going to stay out of the discussion (for now at least), but I just
> want to inform people that they're using incorrect
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:53:15AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> increase in spam. Positive scores are flawed IMHO.
I'm going to stay out of the discussion (for now at least), but I just
want to inform people that they're using incorrect terminology:
You're talking about rules with negative
I'm not the Justin you're trying to talk to but I have an opinion on this
anyhow. :) I'mm strongly against giving a postive score to ANY mail
client. I'm against positive scores in general really. They just open
more doors for spammers to abuse. Everytime one of them finds a new
little trick l
