RE: [SAtalk] whitelist question

ent: Monday, December 29, 2003 5:39 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] whitelist question > > At 02:08 PM 12/28/03 -0800, S. M. C. Butler wrote: > >whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], root, > >Super-User > > &g

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist question

At 02:08 PM 12/28/03 -0800, S. M. C. Butler wrote: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], root, Super-User but unix system messages like the one below still get trapped as spam. I thought that the whitelist_from took precedence over everything else, am I missing something? Appreciate

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist question

Jack Coates wrote: just got a spam that SA 2.55 not only didn't catch, but specifically let through because of whitelisting. I don't have a manual whitelist that matches this message, but I do have auto-whitelist turned on. Is there a way to parse the auto whitelist files and see what's in them? I'

Re: [SAtalk] WHITELIST QUESTION

At 01:12 PM 7/30/2003 -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote: I have a question for someone. What does Whitelist_from actually look at? all headers? or a single one? Is there a way to whitelist this line: From: "Alan Fullmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> any ideas? thanks in advance. w

Re: [SAtalk] WHITELIST QUESTION

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Alan Fullmer wrote: > I have a question for someone. > > What does Whitelist_from actually look at? all headers? or a single one? > > Is there a way to whitelist this line: From: "Alan Fullmer" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Here is how I would do it: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist question:

I finally found http://spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html. which covers this. Using whitelist_from will bypass checking based on the from address. To bypass based on the sending server(and from address) use whitelist_from_rcvd. To bypass tests for all mail from your use whitelist