state dir
debug: bayes: 24040 untie-ing
debug: bayes: 24040 untie-ing db_toks
debug: bayes: 24040 untie-ing db_seen
debug: running raw-body-text per-line regexp tests; score so far=0
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ben Wing" <[EMAIL
2.60
X-Spam-Level: **
Status:
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Martin Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Ben Wing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 3:41 PM
S
02.inet.qwest.net) ([63.231.195.113])
>(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> by 192.220.74.103 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 17 Oct 2003 07:23:43 -
>Received: (qmail 73098 invoked by uid 0); 17 Oct 2003 06:40:41 -
>Received: from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Radford writes:
>At Fri Oct 17 21:17:54 2003, Ben Wing wrote:
>>
>> hi. i just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.6 and i'm seeing something
>> rather odd about the Bayesian results: nearly every one is almost
>> exactly 0%, 50%, or 100%! it's almost a
At Fri Oct 17 21:17:54 2003, Ben Wing wrote:
>
> hi. i just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.6 and i'm seeing something
> rather odd about the Bayesian results: nearly every one is almost
> exactly 0%, 50%, or 100%! it's almost as if it's applying an
> extreme rounding function to the actual result. now
For the record I also began noticing many more 100% Bayesian matches after
upgrading from 2.55 to 2.6. So far it hasn't resulted in any false
positives that I'm aware of, but it has left me feeling slightly uneasy.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Ben Wing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
