RE: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files

2003-09-19 Thread Chris Santerre
: John Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:58 PM > To: 'Chris Santerre' > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files > > > Chris, > > Are there any custom rules to deal with the massive amount of > f

RE: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files

2003-09-12 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: John Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 7:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files > > > Please forgive me if this is already answered in the list > archives. But, if >

Re: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files

2003-09-12 Thread Kristian Koehntopp
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:03:02PM -0700, John Schneider wrote: > This seems to work OK, but I'm not sure it is an efficient setup. It is not. Provided that you have a scenario with non-linear delivery and/or multiple users, there is practically no use at all in calling spamassassin when you cou

Re: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files

2003-09-11 Thread Scott Lambert
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:03:02PM -0700, John Schneider wrote: > Please forgive me if this is already answered in the list archives. But, if > it is, I didn't find it: cd ${WHEREYOUUNPACKEDTHESOURCE}; find . -name 'README*' -print; cat ${FILETHATLOOKSRELEVANT}; -- Scott Lambert