RE: [SAtalk] spamd problems

2003-11-18 Thread Todd Schuldt
Try the Spamd script for SuSE at http://devel-home.kde.org/~kmail/unsupported/spamd This script allows for start/stop/restart/status under init.d (the header says written for 8.0 but it works like a champ under 9.0 pro too) Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [SAtalk] Spamd problems with big loads

2003-10-09 Thread Steve Halligan
> I'm using SA 2.6 spamd/spamc > > I'm using it in a very loaded server, I get arround 2 mail connections > per second. > I want to know if there are people having this kind of load, or even > bigger, cause I don't think this should be a big load for the server. > > The server is Pentium III 1 g

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd problems with big loads

2003-10-08 Thread Robert A. Hayden
I dunno. I've had mine turned off forever and I've had ZERO FNs since upgrading to 2.60 and dumping about 200 messages through sa-learn. On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Brian Morrison wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:45:54 -0500 (CDT) in > [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Robert A. > Hayden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd problems with big loads

2003-10-08 Thread Brian Morrison
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:45:54 -0500 (CDT) in [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Robert A. Hayden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A few things I can recommend that speed things up: > > 1) Turn off RBL lookups How much additional spam did you want to have to look at? -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org dot u

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd problems with big loads

2003-10-08 Thread Fred I-IS.COM
We are receiving near this much mail traffic, I get about 1 connection every 2 seconds, average of 50k messages per day. I am using spamD on 3 different servers to spread the load around, it's working great! In am also running my own creation (WinSpamC) which allows for load-balancing between mul

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd problems with big loads

2003-10-08 Thread Robert A. Hayden
I am running 2.6 on a P4-2.4GHz that gets about 1/3 that amount of traffic and most of my analyses are completed in under .25 seconds. The box is running RH9.0 and using postfix to call procmail. A few things I can recommend that speed things up: 1) Turn off RBL lookups 2) Run a local cachin

Re: [SAtalk] spamd problems

2002-01-27 Thread Craig Hughes
Those error messages seem to be saying that spamd is already running and bound to the port.  Rebooting presumably killed the running processes. C On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 11:07, Robert Dege wrote: Nevermind, I just needed to reboot the server, and now all is well. I'm not sure why it d

Re: [SAtalk] spamd problems

2002-01-27 Thread Robert Dege
Nevermind, I just needed to reboot the server, and now all is well. I'm not sure why it did that, but unless it happens again, I'm not going to worry about it. -Rob > Okay, I'm having some problems getting spamd to run. > > As root, when I execute: > > # spamd > > I get the following error: