ist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] simple question, I hope
>
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> > &g
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> > >
> > > > :0 fw
> > > > |spamassassin -d
> > > >
> > > > :0:
> > > > $MAIL
> > >
> > > how are you suggesting that I actually use these?
>
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > :0 fw
> > > |spamassassin -d
> > >
> > > :0:
> > > $MAIL
> >
> > how are you suggesting that I actually use these?
>
> How do you want to u
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
>
> > :0 fw
> > |spamassassin -d
> >
> > :0:
> > $MAIL
>
> how are you suggesting that I actually use these?
How do you want to use them? You've never explained -when- you want to
remove the
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> > The two obvious approaches seem to have problems:
> >
> > |spamassassin -d |mail $MAIL -- spamassassin will simply reprocess the
> > message, and, in any case, the original headers won't show up properly
> >
> > |spamassassin -d >>$MAIL
> The two obvious approaches seem to have problems:
>
> |spamassassin -d |mail $MAIL -- spamassassin will simply reprocess the
> message, and, in any case, the original headers won't show up properly
>
> |spamassassin -d >>$MAIL -- this could run afoul of sendmail delivering
> mail
>
> So... any s