> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Raul
> Dias
> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 2:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] separate rules from distribution
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Em S?, 2003
At Sat Aug 2 22:16:43 2003, Raul Dias wrote:
> > How about separating the rules from the SpamAssassin distribution
> > itself, and offer them as a separate package? This would be similar to
> > the way intrusion detection systems (Snort, etc.) and antivirus
> > applications work.
>
> I think thi
On Saturday, Aug 2, 2003, at 14:16 US/Pacific, Raul Dias wrote:
Hi,
Em S?, 2003-08-02 às 16:49, Florin Andrei escreveu:
How about separating the rules from the SpamAssassin distribution
itself, and offer them as a separate package? This would be similar to
the way intrusion detection systems
Hi,
Em S?, 2003-08-02 às 16:49, Florin Andrei escreveu:
> How about separating the rules from the SpamAssassin distribution
> itself, and offer them as a separate package? This would be similar to
> the way intrusion detection systems (Snort, etc.) and antivirus
> applications work.
I think thi
Saturday, August 2, 2003, 12:49:08 PM, you wrote:
FA> (I'm not sure if this subject has been discussed before, as i'm not
FA> following the list all the time)
FA> How about separating the rules from the SpamAssassin distribution
FA> itself, and offer them as a separate package? This would be simi
