Actually, I don't think this is the case. You should be able to install them in
either order; SA will use Razor if it finds it at runtime, and not use it if it
doesn't find it (or you say -L).
> > ISTR hearing somewhere that SpamAssassin only enables Razor support if
> > Razor is there when yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Wednesday, 27. February 2002 16:15 schrieben Sie:
> > I just installed SpamAssassin 2.0.1 - it does work very well and I'm
> > quite happy with it. However I get lots of asian spam mail (Don't ask me
> > why. :-( ) which does not get sufficient sco
Behalf Of
Greg Ward
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] problems with SpamAssassin's Razor-integration
> So I tried adding Razor support to SpamAssassin which -
> unfortunately - did
> not work. Vipul's Razor by itself seems t
On 27 February 2002, Gunter Ohrner said:
> I just installed SpamAssassin 2.0.1 - it does work very well and I'm quite
> happy with it. However I get lots of asian spam mail (Don't ask me why. :-(
> ) which does not get sufficient score to be tagged.
Here's a kludgy little rule I use on one of
