RE: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread Gene Ruebsamen
echnical e-mails. Gene > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig > Hughes > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:38 AM > To: Matt Sergeant; 'CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson'; Spamassassin-Talk > Subject: Re: [SA

Re: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread dman
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:40:02PM -0500, Greg Ward wrote: | On 31 January 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson said: | > Thanks for the reply. I am not so good interpreting the tests. Does anyone | > know of a good reference that would help me to interpret what the test is | > doing? | | Randall

Re: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread Craig Hughes
'pay off debt' gets only 9 hits in the corpus 'pay off your debt' gets 86 'debt' shows up almost 10,000 times though, so we might want a broader rule 'debt free' shows up 600 times 'pay off.*debt' -- 226 'debt consolidation' -- over 400 We probably should be a little careful, since if someone

Re: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread Greg Ward
On 31 January 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson said: > Thanks for the reply. I am not so good interpreting the tests. Does anyone > know of a good reference that would help me to interpret what the test is > doing? Randall Schwartz, *Learning Perl* Larry Wall et. al., *Programming Perl* Jef

RE: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> The LINE_OF_YELLING test is (IMHO) too picky in SA 2.0 (and, I presume, > 2.01). See the archive for details. Bottom line, the line has to be >= > 45 characters long, and there has to be a YELLING word >= 5 chars long > >= 20 chars from either end. I proposed a couple of lame replacements, >

Re: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread Greg Ward
On 31 January 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson said: > What puzzles me is that this one should have gotten a LINE OF YELLING and > UNSUBSCRIBE. Something appears broken. The LINE_OF_YELLING test is (IMHO) too picky in SA 2.0 (and, I presume, 2.01). See the archive for details. Bottom line, t

RE: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> > > I'm seeing a lot of debt stuff too... > > How about: > > body PAY_OFF_DEBT /pay off (your )?debt/i > describe PAY_OFF_DEBT A "pay off your debt" spam > > Matt. > -- > <:->Get a smart net > What puzzles me is that this one should have gotten a LINE OF YELLING and UNSUBSCRIBE. Something appe

RE: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01

2002-01-31 Thread Matt Sergeant
I'm seeing a lot of debt stuff too... How about: body PAY_OFF_DEBT /pay off (your )?debt/i describe PAY_OFF_DEBT A "pay off your debt" spam Matt. -- <:->Get a smart net > -Original Message- > From: CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 31 January 2002 16:12 >