RE: [SAtalk] incorporating SA in qmail-smtpd

2002-05-06 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> > It looks like qfilter is inbetween qmail-smtpd and qmail-queue. By that > time, its too late, qmail-smtpd has already accepted the message, > and there > is no way to return an error to the mailer that sent the spam (unless by > some amazing chance, the reply-to, and From addresses are valid)

Re: [SAtalk] incorporating SA in qmail-smtpd

2002-05-05 Thread Lars Hansson
Jon Myers wrote: > It looks like qfilter is inbetween qmail-smtpd and qmail-queue. By that > time, its too late, qmail-smtpd has already accepted the message, and there > is no way to return an error to the mailer that sent the spam (unless by > some amazing chance, the reply-to, and From address

Re: [SAtalk] incorporating SA in qmail-smtpd

2002-05-05 Thread Jon Myers
It looks like qfilter is inbetween qmail-smtpd and qmail-queue. By that time, its too late, qmail-smtpd has already accepted the message, and there is no way to return an error to the mailer that sent the spam (unless by some amazing chance, the reply-to, and From addresses are valid). Or am I m

Re: [SAtalk] incorporating SA in qmail-smtpd

2002-05-05 Thread Lars Hansson
Jon Myers wrote: > This may be a big task, but has anyone thought about incorporating > SpamAssassin into qmail-smtpd. Why not use qfilter instead of a qmail patch? http://www.untroubled.org/qmail-qfilter/ Lars Hansson ___ Have big p