Raquel Rice wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:57:04 -0800
Jeff Lasman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're being hit by MS security update emails. I know they're not
spam, but rather more accurately described as virii or worms.
However, I'm wondering if anyone has a good rule that will mark
these?
Thank
www.exit0.us has a section on catching viri with spamassassin. Debate if
this is a good thing to do if you like. All I'm saying is it _is_ possible
to tag it.
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Lasman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL
I use the procmail sanitizer ...
http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/procmail-security.html
Been using it for years and it traps all of the garbage that people try to
send. Wonderful tool.
Brad
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Jeff Lasman wrote:
> We're being hit by MS security update emails. I know they'r
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 09:56, Kang , Joseph S. wrote:
> > We're being hit by MS security update emails. I know they're
> > not spam,
> > but rather more accurately described as virii or worms.
> >
> > However, I'm wondering if anyone has a good rule that will mark these?
>
> That's a good ques
> We're being hit by MS security update emails. I know they're
> not spam,
> but rather more accurately described as virii or worms.
>
> However, I'm wondering if anyone has a good rule that will mark these?
That's a good question. I got a few of those yesterday (day before?), too.
I was fre
