llel processing.
The files are totally empty when returned from winspamc, so size = 0.
The return path stuff is added by your mailserver afterwards.
/robert
From: Frank M. Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 23. Dezember 2003 19:14
To: Robert Lacroix
Cc: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: [SAta
I am having the same problem with winspamc. I
changed my script to check every return of winspamc against something like
"if size = 0 then send "input_message" instead of "temp_file"". That sends the
message unchecked instead of completely empty. But I doubt it has something do
to with mail
> What version of SpamAssassin?
2.61
> Could the problem possibly be more than one messages trying to be scanned
> at the same time?
yes, I think that could happen. my mail software is calling an external
batch file which creates a separate instance of each scanning batch file for
each message t
Hi,
I am having the same problem with winspamc. I
changed my script to check every return of winspamc against something like
"if size = 0 then send "input_message" instead of "temp_file"". That sends the
message unchecked instead of completely empty. But I doubt it has something do
to with
--On Tuesday, December 23, 2003 10:52 AM -0500 "Frank M. Cook"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm having a problem with blank messages. Sometimes the source only
> shows a return path. I think it may be a spamassassin issue. I'm using
> winspamc and the guys on their forum suggested the proble
At 10:52 AM 12/23/2003, Frank M. Cook wrote:
I'm having a problem with blank messages. Sometimes the source only shows
a return path. I think it may be a spamassassin issue. I'm using
winspamc and the guys on their forum suggested the problem might be caused
by checking messages that have alr
