Original Message-
From: Michael Moncur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Text as images
My thought on this is that there should be an eval test that calculates a
ratio of HTML tags to actual (between the tags) conten
My thought on this is that there should be an eval test that calculates a
ratio of HTML tags to actual (between the tags) content. This would really
just be the ratio of the lengths of the raw and "cooked" versions of the
body, I think. Are both of those available to an eval test or would it have
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Text as images
> On Thu Apr 25 at 04:27:26 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > Who cares? There's a damn near 100% probability such a message is spam.
So we
> > ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 25 Apr 2002 4:34 pm, Sean Harding wrote:
> On Thu Apr 25 at 04:27:26 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > Who cares? There's a damn near 100% probability such a message is spam.
> > So we add a new heuristic for it. Send it along.
>
> It's not *th
On Thu Apr 25 at 04:27:26 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Who cares? There's a damn near 100% probability such a message is spam. So we
> add a new heuristic for it. Send it along.
It's not *that* great of a probability that a message with only images is
spam. I've received them more than once from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 25 Apr 2002 4:03 pm, Sean Harding wrote:
> Another annoying one this morning...I got two copies of a spam that were
> just HTML with img tags. The images contained the text of the message. Yet
> another way to make it difficult (nearly imp
