I'd like a copy of the 'tweaked' version :)
> -Original Message-
> From: mikea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:17 PM
> To: Spamassassin List
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam Statistics
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 04, 200
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:09:31AM -0800, Gary Funck wrote:
>
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Assuming my minor tweaks to the original script I saw posted here are
> > correct, here are my latest spam stats.. *sheesh*
> >
> > Mail Statistics;
> > Mails spam
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:10:01AM -0500, Rubin Bennett wrote:
> WEhat are you all seeing for spam vs. ham stats out there? I just ran
> my list statistics script and here's what I'm experiencing (much WORSE
> than the current "accepted" statistics of about 50/50):
>
> Stats since the 1st of the
CTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ceforge.net cc:
Su
Assuming my minor tweaks to the original script I saw posted here are
correct, here are my latest spam stats.. *sheesh*
Mail Statistics;
Mails spamassassin rejected scanner total mails
Total says 'spam'by rulesetsays virusunde
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:45 AM
> To: Rubin Bennett
>
>
> Assuming my minor tweaks to the original script I saw posted here are
> correct, here are my latest spam stats.. *sheesh*
>
> Mail Statistics;
>
