At 02:45 PM 1/7/2004, Rubin Bennett wrote:
another one...
only scored 0.9 on my sitewide SA, and 2.5 on my personal with Bayes.
On my 2.61 it managed to hit DCC and SORBS, so if you've got the
bandwidth/time for net checks, you might want to give DCC a shot.
I'm also using some of the FVGT rules,
Rubin Bennett wrote:
another one...
only scored 0.9 on my sitewide SA, and 2.5 on my personal with Bayes.
Is this address in BigEvil?
Dunno, I didn't think BigEvil had IPs in it
http://211.158.7.146/ebooks/";>More Info Here
Can we just add 211.0.0.0/8 into BigEvil? Run "host" against whatever
d
It will be in the next update ;)
Thanks
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Rubin Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 2:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Sneaky spam
>
>
> another one...
> only scored 0.9 on my sitewide SA, and 2.5 on m
Hi Tony,
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> Tim wrote:
>
> > This guy sneaked past SpamAssassin 2.55. I only use the address for
> > Yahoogroups subscriptions, so that must have been where the spammer got
> > it. I did [not] "opt in" for anything.
>
> Good news!
>
> 1: *Certainly* d
>
>
> 2: 2.60 official is about to be released.
>
> --
> Tony Earnshaw
Eh? Could you say that again? I like hearing THAT!
-tom
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting P
Tim wrote:
This guy sneaked past SpamAssassin 2.55. I only use the address for
Yahoogroups subscriptions, so that must have been where the spammer got
it. I did [not] "opt in" for anything.
Good news!
1: *Certainly* didn't do anything like sneak past 2.60-CVS. Got 12+, AFAIR;
2: 2.60 official
