Re: [SAtalk] SPAM rule for big@boss.com

2003-07-23 Thread Nix
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, John McGivern stated: > I did the \ in front of the @ and the . and that works great. So a \ > goes in front of any symbol that means something in regex to negate it > and treat it like a character. It's called `escaping' (negation is something quite different in regexps), bu

RE: [SAtalk] SPAM rule for big@boss.com

2003-07-22 Thread John McGivern
I did the \ in front of the @ and the . and that works great. So a \ goes in front of any symbol that means something in regex to negate it and treat it like a character. Thanks All! I considered the blacklist_from but I had a feeling the actual From: field is usually different than the actual

Re: [SAtalk] SPAM rule for big@boss.com

2003-07-22 Thread mikea
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:34:18PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about spam from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]": > > just wondering-- > > does anyone know what virus causes that one? That's SoBig.A, according to Symantec's website. The more recent SoBig flavors are a little less predictable. -- Mike A

Re: [SAtalk] SPAM rule for big@boss.com

2003-07-22 Thread Klaus Mueller
Did you try: blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Klaus --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual mach

Re: [SAtalk] SPAM rule for big@boss.com

2003-07-22 Thread jvanasco
just wondering-- does anyone know what virus causes that one? On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 01:05 PM, John McGivern wrote: Hi everyone. I would like to use SA to block this an email with this in the freom field: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I've tried creating a rule but I haven't been successful bec