"Derrick 'dman' Hudson" said:
> | BTW my position on this, FWIW, is to take the old IETF position: "be
> | conservative in what you send, and liberal in what you receive".
> Doesn't that kind of imply accepting all the spam and whatever other
> junk is thrown at you?
Not *that* liberal ;) It's
"CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" said:
> But with the large amount of Outlook Express users out there I imagine that
> this rule will cause alot of false positives. You can talk all day about MS
> not following RFC standards but in the end the customer still gets
> legitimate email tagged as Spam
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 the voices made CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson write:
> But with the large amount of Outlook Express users out there I imagine that
> this rule will cause alot of false positives. You can talk all day about MS
> not following RFC standards but in the end the customer still gets
But with the large amount of Outlook Express users out there I imagine that
this rule will cause alot of false positives. You can talk all day about MS
not following RFC standards but in the end the customer still gets
legitimate email tagged as Spam and is not happy and they don't care about
RFC
