Re: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_ORBS

2003-09-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:43, Gary Carr wrote: > SA is flagging 100% of the incoming email with the RCVD_IN_ORBS score. Even > mail from our internal network. None of the ip addresses are listed in [...] > Has the orbs.dorkslayers.com gone the way of Osirusoft? dorkslayers has been dead as a doorna

RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_ORBS

2003-09-16 Thread Todd Schuldt
Posted in another newgroup area: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "As has been pointed out on the NANOG mailing list, many recent versions of SpamAssassin still check for DNSBLs on dorkslayers.com. While dorkslayers.com is still a registered domain name, it doesn't have a name server and therefor

Re: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_ORBS

2003-09-16 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Gary Carr wrote: > SA is flagging 100% of the incoming email with the RCVD_IN_ORBS score. Even > mail from our internal network. None of the ip addresses are listed in > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=3.0 > tests=RCVD_IN_ORBS > version=2.55 > > Has the orbs.dorkslaye

Re: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_ORBS

2003-09-16 Thread Jim
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 01:43:14PM -0400, Gary Carr wrote: > SA is flagging 100% of the incoming email with the RCVD_IN_ORBS score. Even > mail from our internal network. None of the ip addresses are listed in > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=3.0 > tests=RCVD_IN_ORBS > version=2.55 > >