Re: [SAtalk] Question for the FAQ

2003-09-21 Thread Ivar Magne Auestad
What I talk about is assassinating spam depending on Mail Attribute characteristics, like name. Chris Santerre wrote: You can see some of the custom virus rules at www.exit0.us I don't believe you will ever see them in releases of spamassassin. But you can always add the ones that are custom wri

RE: [SAtalk] Question for the FAQ

2003-09-20 Thread Chris Santerre
You can see some of the custom virus rules at www.exit0.us I don't believe you will ever see them in releases of spamassassin. But you can always add the ones that are custom written. It just has to do with semantics. It is called Spamassassin, and that has to be its main focus. > -Original

Re: [SAtalk] Question for the FAQ

2003-09-19 Thread Jim
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 05:31:33PM -0400, Bruce Pennypacker wrote: > The problem I'm finding with the latest worm is that sometimes the MIME > attachment for the actual worm isn't included in the e-mail. I've > already set MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE high but I'm still getting a few > e-mails an hour

Re: [SAtalk] Question for the FAQ

2003-09-19 Thread Bruce Pennypacker
Jim wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:00:40PM +0500, Ivar Magne Auestad wrote: You are writing in the FAQ that you don't focus on viruses, but I have a suggestion. It would be very easy to add attachment type as a qualifyer. Very many viruses are attached as .pif-files or double extention attac

Re: [SAtalk] Question for the FAQ

2003-09-19 Thread Jim
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:00:40PM +0500, Ivar Magne Auestad wrote: > You are writing in the FAQ that you don't focus on viruses, but I have a > suggestion. It would be very easy to add attachment type as a qualifyer. > Very many viruses are attached as .pif-files or double extention > attachmen

RE: [SAtalk] Question for the FAQ

2003-09-19 Thread Tom Meunier
Absolutely. www.exit0.us/index.php/VirusBounceRules among other things. -tom > -Original Message- > From: Ivar Magne Auestad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Question for the FAQ >