RE: [SAtalk] Postfix and SpamAssassin 2.01 - spamproxyd/Mail::Audit problems

2002-02-18 Thread Greg Blakely
MAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: Greg Blakely; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Postfix and SpamAssassin 2.01 - spamproxyd/Mail::Audit problems Craig Hughes wrote: > Actually, we dropped Mail::Audit since it doesn&#x

RE: [SAtalk] Postfix and SpamAssassin 2.01 - spamproxyd/Mail::Audit problems

2002-02-18 Thread Stewart, John
Craig Hughes wrote: > Actually, we dropped Mail::Audit since it doesn't work in a variety of > situations, and replaced it with our own version, > Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit -- change the line to use > that class instead > (and the "use" line at the beginning of the file) and you > should

RE: [SAtalk] Postfix and SpamAssassin 2.01 - spamproxyd/Mail::Audit problems

2002-02-18 Thread Greg Blakely
Up around the top of the script where it says "use this; use that; use the-other;" put in a line that says "use Mail::Audit;" This only creates ONE process, though. The author has given me a copy of a newer script he wrote that spawns children. It's very stable. I've had it running here for ab

Re: [SAtalk] Postfix and SpamAssassin 2.01 -spamproxyd/Mail::Audit problems

2002-02-18 Thread Craig Hughes
on 2/18/02 11:31 AM, Stewart, John at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The author of Mail::Audit, Simon Cozens, commented: >> Sounds like someone's forgot the "use Mail::Audit". Actually, we dropped Mail::Audit since it doesn't work in a variety of situations, and replaced it with our own version, Mail