RE: [SAtalk] Mail routing with SA

2002-12-19 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Theo > Van Dinter > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:26 PM > To: Ross Vandegrift > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Mail routing with SA > > >

Re: [SAtalk] Mail routing with SA

2002-12-19 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:25:53PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > The way I do this is through the use of alias or virtusertable > configurations. The mail router has a list of all valid addresses, > and it's always something like: > > user: [EMAIL PROTECTED] That would work nicely. It's a bit

Re: [SAtalk] Mail routing with SA

2002-12-19 Thread Jason Baker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On December 19, 2002 12:55, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I need a more intelligent mail routing setup. The primary MX > for our domain is a sendmail machine that runs spamassassin. It scans > email, and then (via an entry in the

Re: [SAtalk] Mail routing with SA

2002-12-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > The primary MX host just routes mail to the delivery server. How have > you guys handled this problem? Ideally, I'd rather not have two > machines with real work to do spend so much time trying to send out > bounce messages to non