Hi,
The email has the phrase "erectile dysfunction", which also matches the
IMPOTENCE rule.
> 20_phrases.cf:body IMPOTENCE /\b(?:impotence
(?:problem|cure|solution)|Premature
> Ejaculation|erectile dysfunction)/i
Daz
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> How did I not see that!
>
> Would it be wise to sa-learn that message as ham?
yep, exactly the correct response ;)
--j.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports,
On 08/12/03 01:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sat at the `puter and typed:
> How did I not see that!
>
> Would it be wise to sa-learn that message as ham?
Nope. I'd just whitelist the sender - assuming it's a closed list, of
course.
Lou
>
>
> Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ..
> > Th
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> On 08/12/03 01:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sat at the `puter and typed:
> >
> > Would it be wise to sa-learn that message as ham?
>
> Nope.
Eh? Of course it would be wise to learn the message as ham. The more
data the classifier has, the more accurate
On 08/12/03 01:09 PM, Justin Mason sat at the `puter and typed:
>
> Bart Schaefer writes:
> >The point is that -- aside from the rule "do not teach spam as ham, nor
> >teach ham as spam" -- YOU DON'T REALLY KNOW what data will increase or
> >decrease the classifier's accuracy. As a human, you're
Bart Schaefer writes:
>The point is that -- aside from the rule "do not teach spam as ham, nor
>teach ham as spam" -- YOU DON'T REALLY KNOW what data will increase or
>decrease the classifier's accuracy. As a human, you're good at making the
>gestalt (and subjective) judgement "this is spam" (or
How did I not see that!
Would it be wise to sa-learn that message as ham?
Thanks
Gareth
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ..
> The rule hits "erectile dysfunction":
>
> SEX TIP FOR INVESTORS
> Pfizer shareholders all know there's a growing market for the=20
> treatment of erecti
On 08/12/03 12:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sat at the `puter and typed:
> Hi Everyone
Hey
Snipping for brevity . . .
This next item is what did it. 'Erectile dysfunction' is just a fancy
way of saying 'impotence' after all.
>[6]Sex Tip For Investors
>Pfizer shareholders all know there's
Mike Burger writes:
> Agreed...it's not likely that that particular message is going to pass
> through the list, again, in the same form, so the bayes database wouldn't
> really mean squat at that point, insofar as that message goes.
Yes -- but when you learn a message as ham, it learns *all as
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > Ideally you'd train [SA's Bayesian] on every message you receive.
>
> That particular message will almost certainly never pass through his
> system again, so why use the content to train bayes?
If that argument was valid, you'd never train Bayes on h
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> On 08/12/03 01:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sat at the `puter and typed:
> > How did I not see that!
> >
> > Would it be wise to sa-learn that message as ham?
>
> Nope. I'd just whitelist the sender - assuming it's a closed list, of
> course.
Agreed
On 08/12/03 09:07 AM, Bart Schaefer sat at the `puter and typed:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
>
> > On 08/12/03 01:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sat at the `puter and typed:
> > >
> > > Would it be wise to sa-learn that message as ham?
> >
> > Nope.
>
> Eh? Of course it would be wis
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 12:32:58PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> I receive a daily email from a financial mailing list, it is never usually
> identified as spam, however, they today made the mistake of capitalising the subject
> line of the email, but the really killer was th
13 matches
Mail list logo
