On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
> Charles Gregory Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 4:33 PM
>
> > Just at a rough guess, I would say that whoever resides on or near
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 'force9.net' has
> > something strange in their mail handling that is re-mailing articles?
>
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
> Charles Gregory Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 4:33 PM
> > Just at a rough guess, I would say that whoever resides on or near
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 'force9.net' has
> > something strange in their mail handling that is re-mailing articles?
> Per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Gregory writes:
>But this duplicate went through (in chronological order):
> sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net(66.35.250.206)
> netmail00.services.quay.plus.net(212.159.14.218)
> mail.force9.net [212.159.10.2]
>De
Charles Gregory Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 4:33 PM
> Just at a rough guess, I would say that whoever resides on or near
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 'force9.net' has
> something strange in their mail handling that is re-mailing articles?
Per my post just the other day, I have been receiving man
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:32:41 -0500 (EST)
Charles Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > Actually, I'm sorry Charles. You may have gotten 4 copies from me!
>
> I tried to take that into account. Including your 'direct' replies, the
> count is actually u
t 2003 15:44:14 -0500
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:44:14 -0500
> X-Fetchmail-Warning: no recipient addresses matched declared local names
> X-Sanitizer: Advosys mail filter
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
> king.hw
> Okay, this is about the third or fourth copy of Chris' message.
> I'm pasting the full headers in case some list guru can tell from them
> where this message might have gotten duplicated.
>
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
*snip* I never write anything that important (-:
Actual
