Tom Meunier wrote:
>
Even on good mail?
Duh! Sorry for that half-baed description. Spams are marked 99%. It is
not falsely classifying good messages. Actually, I saw two 90% scores today.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer re
At 08:36 AM 10/22/2003, Scott Rothgaber wrote:
My Bayes database finally got its 200 spams and hams and kicked in. I've
noticed, however, that it *always* says that the probability is 99%. Is
this normal?
No.. It is however quite normal for nearly all spams to be at 99% and
nearly all nonspam to
Even on good mail? Or only on Spam? Because when I see spam, I'm 99%
sure it's spam, and a well-trained Bayes engine would be 99% sure also.
If it's on good mail that you're seeing 99%, every time, then your
database is screwed up and you should start over.
> -Original Message-
> From:
