Alton Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now even more weird. I just installed it on a Solaris 8 box and no
> problems.
>
> Are you guys sure it's the bug?
If you're running Perl 5.005, then SA will not use taint-mode since Perl
5.005 is so hopelessly old. Therefore, the taint-mode problems in
R
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
> Quinlan
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:09 PM
> To: Theo Van Dinter
> Cc: Daniel Quinlan; Ben Goodwin; Darren Coleman;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped
>
>
> Theo Van Dinter <[E
:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
Quinlan
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:09 PM
To: Theo Van Dinter
Cc: Daniel Quinlan; Ben Goodwin; Darren Coleman;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped
Theo
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:49:52PM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote:
> should also print out an install-time warning and stuff all of the major
> documentation files into /usr/share/doc/spamassassin if it doesn't
> already. I'm not optimistic, though.
The ones that are installed now in the RPM btw:
Chan
Ben Goodwin wrote:
>> OK, I see the reference to the patch, but the RPMS don't include it :-\
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They do in the tarball. But it's not a doc or a tool, or part of the
> actual code ...
It's in the INSTALL, the README, the announcement, and the Razor2.
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The ones that are installed now in the RPM btw:
>
> Changes INSTALL README README.spamd sample-nonspam.txt sample-spam.txt
I'd also include:
BUGS
COPYRIGHT
License
TRADEMARK
USAGE
Razor2.patch
> yeah, now that I've changed it. the
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:48:15PM -0400, Ben Goodwin wrote:
> OK, I see the reference to the patch, but the RPMS don't include it :-\
They do in the tarball. But it's not a doc or a tool, or part of the
actual code ...
> The README says until at least 2.36 implying 2.36 fixes it, but the patch
g 2.36 fixes it, but the patch
says otherwise. Off to patch my installation.
Thanks!
-=| Ben
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Coleman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ben Goodwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 20
This was answered earlier on today by Daniel Quinlan. The long and
short of it is, RTFM. :)
(Read the README file, in particular the reference to Razor2.patch)
Daz
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Goodwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 September 2003 13:16
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
