What the? I have received several of these today. I'm not sending any mail
that would actually generate a legitimate delivery receipt, so what does
this message mean?
Side note: they are using an old domain that is disused, so definitely a
a spam behind this somewhere.
- Charles
--
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:42:38 -0400 Theo Van Dinter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:38:47PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Hrm. I'm wondering what that's gonna do to the Bayes_* scores for those
tokens?
if it's only 1 message, not a lot. I always learn on error
: Re: [SAtalk] What the F??
At 10:36 PM 9/11/03 -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>a SPAM message being learned as HAM?
>
>
>X-Spam-Flag: YES
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-rc4 (1.203-2003-08-29-exp) on
> lerami.lerctr.org
>X-Spam-Level: *
>X-Sp
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:38:47PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Hrm. I'm wondering what that's gonna do to the Bayes_* scores for those
> tokens?
if it's only 1 message, not a lot. I always learn on error though.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"You can't run sausage backwards through a meat
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:46:37PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I.E. feed it back in?
yes.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Could this be the best day of my life?
-- Homer Simpson
Homer the Heretic
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
At 10:36 PM 9/11/03 -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
a SPAM message being learned as HAM?
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-rc4 (1.203-2003-08-29-exp) on
lerami.lerctr.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:35:14 -0400 Theo Van Dinter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:36:51PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
a SPAM message being learned as HAM?
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=ham version=2.60
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:36:51PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> a SPAM message being learned as HAM?
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE
> autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc4
BAYES_* doesn't affect autolearning (or else it would get into a feedback
cycle). H
a SPAM message being learned as HAM?
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-rc4 (1.203-2003-08-29-exp) on
lerami.lerctr.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc4
MIME-Version: 1.0
A bit more clear of a hint since not all of us use the same font types (ie:
on my MUA Theo mostly underlined SUB_FREE_OFFER):
score USER_IN_WHITELIST -100
So it would appear the from: address was manually whitelisted, or was one
of the few defaults that ships with SA.
Note that yo
At 11:35 AM 11/12/2002, you wrote:
any idea why this happened. Look at the score:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-91.6 required=6.0
tests=BIG_FONT,CLICK_BELOW,CTYPE_JUST_HTML,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
EARN_PER_WEEK,EXPECT_TO_EARN,GREAT_OFFER,
HTML_COMMENT_UNIQUE_ID,HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED,
HTML_FONT_FACE_CAPS,INV
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:35:04PM -0500, Phynias_CO wrote:
> any idea why this happened. Look at the score:
not without the whole message.
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-91.6 required=6.0
> SPAM_PHRASE_08_13,SUB_FREE_OFFER,USER_IN_WHITELIST
hint: ^
--
R
any idea why this happened. Look at the score:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-91.6 required=6.0
tests=BIG_FONT,CLICK_BELOW,CTYPE_JUST_HTML,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
EARN_PER_WEEK,EXPECT_TO_EARN,GREAT_OFFER,
HTML_COMMENT_UNIQUE_ID,HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED,
HTML_FONT_FACE_CAPS,INVALID_DATE,LOW_PRICE,MONTH_TRIAL,
NO_
13 matches
Mail list logo
