on Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:51:30AM +0200%, Tony Earnshaw said:
jeff> 75 spam messages have been recorded as ham. i don't have
jeff> the original messages, so i can't use sa-learn to unlearn
jeff> them. how can i keep the spam i've given the filter but
jeff> wipe out all the ham,
jeff covey wrote:
on Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:50:22AM -0400%, Ross Vandegrift said:
ross> if you retrain Bayes with the messages in question
apparently, this thread has wandered far enough that my original
message has been forgotten. it's here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-ta
on Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:50:22AM -0400%, Ross Vandegrift said:
ross> if you retrain Bayes with the messages in question
apparently, this thread has wandered far enough that my original
message has been forgotten. it's here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=1055869669284
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:43:55PM -0400, jeff covey wrote:
> while the side issues are interesting, does anyone have answers for
> the actual questions that started this thread? :)
LOL, yes - if you retrain Bayes with the messages in question and
specifically mention that it's spam, they should
on Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 05:30:52PM -0700%, Balam Willemsen said:
q> Do the fuzzy checksums ignore "personalizations"?
a> Yes, they ignore many so called "personalizations".
err. thanks, but that's not really enough information to tell me
anything. what is considered a "personalizatio
while the side issues are interesting, does anyone have answers for
the actual questions that started this thread? :)
most importantly: can i remove all the (bogus) ham data in my bayes
database without removing any of the (valid) spam data i've collected?
as for reporting leading to learning a
nal Message-
> From: Jim Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 5:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] unlearning a lot of ham
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:44:06PM -0400, jeff covey wrote:
> > i assume that other people could use re
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:44:06PM -0400, jeff covey wrote:
> i assume that other people could use reports of generic spam i've
> received, but that it won't help them to have a checksum of a message
> which is customized with my name, email address, etc. it's not going
> to help me to know that
on Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:22:18PM +0100%, Jim Ford said:
jim> I didn't realise you'd want to learn spam but not report it!
jim> Why would you want to do this - I always report spam that
jim> slips through to Razor?
i assume that other people could use reports of generic spam i've
rec
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:26:14PM -0400, jeff covey wrote:
> on Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 07:06:52PM +0100%, Jim Ford said:
> jim> so the first 2 macros are redundant.
>
> i don't understand what you're trying to say. one learns spam (for
> spam i don't want to report) and one learns and reports
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 12:53:57PM -0400, jeff covey wrote:
> hello, all.
> # train spamassassin's bayesian filter
> macro index S "| sa-learn --single --spam -D"
> macro pager S "| sa-learn --single --spam -D"
> # report spam to razor
> macro index Z "| spamassassin -r -D"
> macro pager Z "| spam
hello, all.
i'm running spamassassin 2.55 on a debian testing system. i wanted to
do the following:
for spam specific to me (containing my name, a unique spamee number, etc.):
tell spamassassin it's spam.
for generic spam:
tell spamassassin it's spam and report it to razor, pyzor, etc.
so
12 matches
Mail list logo
