Re: [SAtalk] spamd stopped responding

2003-06-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Fri, 30 May 2003 13:00:52 -0400: > hmmm. that looks suspiciously like a sh if statement gone awry. It's > not spamd doing that. > Late comment. I indeed found a shell script containing an expression like "!= "jui" ]". But it remains a mystery how it got to mix with a s

Re: [SAtalk] spamd stopped responding

2003-05-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 06:31:27PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > 25527 ?S 0:03 /usr/bin/perl -w /usr/bin/spamd != jui ] > > This looks weird to me. jui is a user on that machine. Does it mean spamd > died when changing to that user? hmmm. that looks suspiciously like a sh if stateme

[SAtalk] spamd stopped responding

2003-05-31 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Our spamd stopped responding today (first time ever). I'm running 2.60-cvs from two days ago, so it may be a problem with the code there. I just wait and get another copy from cvs. But what I don't understand is this line in ps: 25527 ?S 0:03 /usr/bin/perl -w /usr/bin/spamd != jui