Re: [SAtalk] spamd refuse to load

2002-07-05 Thread Willy Sutrisno
* Ryan Cleary ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > 1) A program has already bound to the spamd port (783 by default), > possibly another copy of spamd. Depending on what operating system > you're running, you may be able to check this with the "netstat" > command. I run netstat, no prog is

Re: [SAtalk] spamd refuse to load

2002-07-05 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 01:40:49AM -0400, Ryan Cleary wrote: > > "bind: Cannot assign requested address at /usr/sbin/spamd line 135." > > This probably means one of two things: > > 1) A program has already bound to the spamd port (783 by default), > 2) 783 is a reserved port, meaning that yo