Re: [SAtalk] spamd 2.20 bad protocol

2002-05-14 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 06:22:03AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > >Soem very huge Mails (about 2 MB) coming in, will be investigated by spamc > >(2.20), which is breaking after a few seconds because mail is too big (> > >25k). But then, the spamass-milter timout in sendmail works after 12 > >minut

Re: [SAtalk] spamd 2.20 bad protocol

2002-05-14 Thread Olivier Nicole
>Soem very huge Mails (about 2 MB) coming in, will be investigated by spamc >(2.20), which is breaking after a few seconds because mail is too big (> >25k). But then, the spamass-milter timout in sendmail works after 12 >minutes (!) and the mail seems not be be delivered, so the sender tries it >a

[SAtalk] spamd 2.20 bad protocol

2002-05-14 Thread Andreas Vogt
Hi, beside of the problem, I already mentioned here (without getting any help), I encountered today a real big problem: Soem very huge Mails (about 2 MB) coming in, will be investigated by spamc (2.20), which is breaking after a few seconds because mail is too big (> 25k). But then, the sp

[SAtalk] spamd 2.20 bad protocol

2002-05-10 Thread Andreas Vogt
Hi, today I searched the list for a special problem. I'm using spamassassin 2.20 on linux / sendmail 8.12.3, sitewide with spamass-milter (0.1.1). Nearly everytime, spamc contacts spamd, I get a logline ... spamd[]: bad protocol: header error: (closed before headers) I also use milter-ama